Cognitive Outcomes in BAD-related Stroke (NCT07761182) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
Cognitive Outcomes in BAD-related Stroke
China60 participantsStarted 2026-09-01
Plain-language summary
Branch atheromatous disease (BAD) is a distinct subtype of ischemic stroke that is particularly prevalent among Chinese and other Asian populations. Patients with BAD are prone to early neurological deterioration and poor functional outcomes, and BAD is increasingly recognized as an independent disease entity. However, the association between BAD and cognitive impairment remains unclear. This nationwide, multicenter, prospective observational study will prospectively collect epidemiological, clinical, neuroimaging, functional, and cognitive outcome data from patients with BAD. The study aims to investigate the occurrence of cognitive impairment after BAD and identify the clinical and neuroimaging characteristics associated with cognitive impairment. In particular, the relationship between early neurological deterioration (END) and cognitive impairment will be investigated. As an exploratory objective, this study will further explore the potential brain network mechanisms underlying cognitive impairment associated with END events.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 80 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Age: 18-80 years.
. Time from onset to enrollment: 8-14 days; if onset time is unknown, time from last known normal to enrollment must be 8-14 days.
. Meet the following imaging inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria
. Baseline imaging showing intracranial hemorrhagic disease, vascular malformation, space-occupying lesion, or other non-ischemic intracranial pathology.
. Transient ischemic attack or stroke mimics.
. Cardioembolic causes: including atrial fibrillation, valvular heart disease, infective endocarditis, etc.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score at 1 year after enrollment