This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized patient simulation-based educational intervention among undergraduate nursing students enrolled in the Mental Health Nursing course at the Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cyprus International University, during the 2025-2026 academic year. A total of 70 eligible undergraduate nursing students were randomly allocated to an experimental group or a control group. Students in the experimental group participated in a structured simulation-based educational program using trained standardized patients portraying individuals with bipolar disorder. The simulation scenarios represent common clinical presentations of bipolar disorder, including acute manic episodes, depressive episodes , emotional instability, and mixed features associated with medication non-adherence. Students practice mental health assessment, therapeutic communication, therapeutic relationship building, and appropriate nursing interventions, followed by structured debriefing and reflection. The intervention was based on the principles of Jean Watson's Theory of Human Caring and was delivered through weekly simulation sessions. The control group received the routine Mental Health Nursing curriculum, including theoretical instruction and regular clinical placement experiences, without participation in the standardized patient simulation program. The primary outcome is therapeutic communication skills, while secondary outcomes include empathy and communication self-efficacy. Outcomes will be assessed using validated assessment scales at baseline and after completion of the intervention. The study evaluate whether standardized patient simulation is more effective than traditional teaching methods in developing key clinical and interpersonal competencies among undergraduate nursing students preparing to care for patients with bipolar disorder.
Age range
18 Years – 27 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Therapeutic communication
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4 (end of intervention)