Hydrocephalus remains one of the most common conditions encountered in neurosurgery, traditionally managed by ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting. Despite its effectiveness, shunt dependency is associated with certain complications including infection, obstruction, and repeated revisions, leading to increased morbidity and healthcare burden. Over the last 70 years, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting and more recently endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) have been the mainstays of hydrocephalus treatment. In recent years, choroid plexus cauterization (CPC) has re-emerged as an additional treatment strategy. In combination with ETV, CPC increases the chances of successfully treating some cases with hydrocephalus, than ETV alone. Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy (ETV) has emerged as an alternative physiological treatment by creating a bypass for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow. However, its success is limited in infants and in other varieties of hydrocephalus. The addition of Choroid Plexus Cauterization (CPC), which reduces CSF production, has been shown to improve outcomes when combined with ETV, particularly in younger patients. The idea is based on the principle that ablation of the predominant source of CSF secretion within the brain, choroid plexus (CP), reduces CSF production. In addition, CPC may reduce CSF pulsatility, an effect which may be potentiated when combined with ETV, which might reduce intraventricular pulsations by serving as a pulsation absorber. These effects, in combination, may tip the balance in favour of CSF absorption and negate the need for shunting in a proportion of patients. The combined ETV-CPC approach, popularized by Benjamin Warf, has demonstrated promising results in reducing shunt dependence, especially in resource-limited settings. However, variability in success rates persists due to differences in patient selection, etiology, and surgical expertise. This study aims at evaluation of the efficacy of combined ETV-CPC as a primary treatment modality for hydrocephalus and to identify predictors of surgical success and failure, thereby optimizing patient selection and improving outcomes.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
2. shunt-free survival
Timeframe: 2 years minimumly