A Simulated Case Study of a Peritoneal Dialysis-Specialized Large Language Model Assisting Doctor… (NCT07724327) | Clinical Trial Compass
By InvitationNot Applicable
A Simulated Case Study of a Peritoneal Dialysis-Specialized Large Language Model Assisting Doctors in Improving Decision-Making in Peritoneal Dialysis Management
China100 participantsStarted 2026-07-10
Plain-language summary
This study is a randomized controlled trial based on simulated clinical cases, aiming to establish a standardized evaluation system for PD physicians, to assess the differences in PD management quality between a workflow assisted by a PD-specialized large language model and physician-only decision-making, and to identify potential risks (such as generating obviously erroneous or even harmful recommendations). This simulated clinical case framework not only supports standardized and blinded evaluation, but also provides preliminary evidence for the model's effectiveness and safety before its deployment in real clinical settings, while avoiding direct impact on real patients.
Who can participate
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Internal medicine or nephrology standardized training residents, licensed residents, or attending physicians.
. Independent experience in PD management ≤ 3 years.
. Provided signed informed consent and agreed to comply with the trial procedures.
Exclusion criteria
. Direct involvement in the development or training of the specialized PD large language model, or in the construction of the clinical scenarios/ scoring criteria used in this trial.
. Participation in the pilot testing of all clinical scenarios used in this trial.
. Inability or unwillingness to access the study platform or use online resources during the study period.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Management Reasoning
Timeframe: Within the 120-minute test period of the first test.
Trial details
NCT IDNCT07724327
SponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University