This single-center, two-phase cohort study aimed to develop and validate a simple endoscopic classification of fundoplication integrity after anti-reflux surgery (ARS - Nissen or Toupet fundoplication). Consecutive adult patients undergoing endoscopy, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and reflux monitoring after ARS were included. Retroflexed endoscopic videoclips were reviewed blinded to clinical and functional results. In the development cohort (2018-2024, n=73), individual endoscopic parameters were tested against pathologic GERD (Lyon 2.0 criteria). Three parameters significantly correlated with pathologic reflux: (1) intrathoracic valve location, (2) disrupted valve (deep anterior and/or posterior grooves), and (3) visible hiatal opening. Patients were stratified according to the number of impaired mechanisms (0-3). Symptom burden, manometric abnormalities, and reflux metrics worsened progressively with increasing impairment. The rate of pathologic GERD rose from 11.8% (0 mechanisms) to 37.5% (1-2 mechanisms) to 85.7% (3 mechanisms). The classification was then prospectively validated in an independent cohort (2024-2026, n=49), reproducing the same stepwise correlation. The number of impaired mechanisms showed excellent discriminatory capacity for pathologic GERD (AUC 0.860 in development, 0.870 in validation; overall AUC 0.869). This simple endoscopic classification, based on only three objective parameters, reliably identifies fundoplication failure and correlates with symptoms and objective pathophysiologic data. It has the potential to standardize endoscopic reporting after ARS.
Age range
18 Years – 90 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
acid exposure time
Timeframe: during pH impedance monitoring