Implant Stability Outcomes Following Immediate Implant Placement Using Osseodensification Versus … (NCT07719764) | Clinical Trial Compass
By InvitationNot Applicable
Implant Stability Outcomes Following Immediate Implant Placement Using Osseodensification Versus Conventional Drilling
Saudi Arabia20 participantsStarted 2025-12-20
Plain-language summary
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare osseodensification and conventional drilling for immediate dental implant placement in mandibular molar extraction sockets in adults requiring extraction and implant replacement.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does osseodensification improve primary and secondary implant stability compared with conventional drilling? Does osseodensification result in better clinical and radiographic peri-implant outcomes, including marginal bone loss, peri-implant bone density, probing depth, plaque and bleeding indices, during the healing period?
Researchers will compare immediate implant placement performed using osseodensification drilling with immediate implant placement performed using conventional drilling to determine whether osseodensification provides superior implant stability and peri-implant tissue outcomes.
Participants will:
Undergo atraumatic extraction of a mandibular molar followed by immediate implant placement.
Be randomly assigned to receive implant site preparation using either osseodensification or conventional drilling.
Receive the same implant system and standardized surgical and prosthetic protocols.
Attend scheduled follow-up visits for clinical examinations, implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis (ISQ), and radiographic evaluation of marginal bone loss and peri-implant bone density during healing and after prosthetic restoration.
Who can participate
Age range
20 Years – 50 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
Adults aged 20 years - 50 years. Patients requiring extraction of a mandibular first or second molar with immediate implant placement.
Presence of sufficient interradicular and apical bone to achieve primary implant stability following immediate implant placement.
Adequate bone dimensions to accommodate the planned dental implant without the need for extensive bone augmentation.
Good oral hygiene and willingness to comply with the study protocol and follow-up visits.
Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent.
\-
Exclusion Criteria:
Uncontrolled systemic diseases or medical conditions contraindicating oral surgery or implant placement.
Pregnancy or lactation. Current smokers or tobacco users. Untreated active periodontal disease or poor oral hygiene. Acute infection or extensive pathology at the implant site that would preclude immediate implant placement.
History of radiotherapy to the head and neck region or treatment with intravenous bisphosphonates or other medications known to adversely affect bone healing.
Bruxism or parafunctional habits likely to compromise implant success. Inability or unwillingness to attend scheduled follow-up visits or comply with study requirements.
\-
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.