First Attempt Insertion Success of Novel Two Person Lateral Rotation Technique V.S Standard Brain… (NCT07715708) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
First Attempt Insertion Success of Novel Two Person Lateral Rotation Technique V.S Standard Brain Technique for LMA Insertion
Egypt70 participantsStarted 2026-07-01
Plain-language summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if two person lateral rotation technique of LMA insertion is more successful than the standard technique in achieving effective ventilation on the first introduction of the LMA .The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does two person lateral rotation technique of LMA insertion lower the number of times needed to inesrt the LMA ?
Researchers will compare two person lateral rotation technique of LMA insertion to standard technique to see if it is more successful
Participants will be subjected to the two way of LMA insertion
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 65 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Adult patients aged 18-65 years
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II
* Scheduled for elective superficial surgical procedures under general anesthesia (e.g., limb orthopedic surgery, hernioplasty, soft tissue excision)
* Anticipated surgical duration \< 90 minutes
* Body mass index (BMI) 18.5-30 kg/m²
Exclusion Criteria:
* \- Anticipated difficult airway (Mallampati grade IV, thyromental distance \< 6 cm, limited neck extension)
* History of gastroesophageal reflux disease or increased aspiration risk
* Full stomach or emergency surgery - Intra-abdominal, laparoscopic, head and neck, or prone-position procedures - Known allergy to anesthetic agents
* Pregnancy
* Previous pharyngeal or laryngeal surgery - Inability to provide informed consent
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
First-attempt insertion success rate, defined as successful placement achieving effective ventilation on the first introduction of the LMA into the oral cavity