Randomized Study of Triple Therapy vs Sildenafil Dose Optimization in Pulmonary Arterial Hyperten… (NCT07713914) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingPhase 4
Randomized Study of Triple Therapy vs Sildenafil Dose Optimization in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Brazil196 participantsStarted 2026-07-22
Plain-language summary
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive disease characterized by increased pressure in the pulmonary arteries, leading to right heart failure and premature death. Although combination therapy has improved outcomes, many patients remain at intermediate or high clinical risk despite treatment.
When patients do not reach low-risk status, treatment escalation is recommended. However, different escalation strategies are used in clinical practice, including increasing the dose of existing medications or adding a third drug that targets a different biological pathway. There is limited prospective randomized evidence directly comparing these approaches.
The ASCEND-PAH study is a prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial designed to compare two therapeutic escalation strategies in adults with PAH who remain at intermediate or high risk despite dual therapy with an endothelin receptor antagonist and sildenafil. Participants will be randomized to either: (1) escalation to triple therapy with the addition of a prostacyclin pathway agent, or (2) optimization of dual therapy by increasing the dose of sildenafil.
The primary objective is to compare the proportion of patients who improve their risk category according to the COMPERA 2.0 four-stratum risk model within 3 to 6 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes include changes in functional status, exercise capacity, biomarkers, clinical worsening, safety, and treatment persistence
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Age ≥18 years
* Diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH, Group 1) confirmed according to accepted clinical and hemodynamic criteria
* Stable treatment with an endothelin receptor antagonist in combination with sildenafil prior to randomization
* Classified as intermediate-low, intermediate-high, or high risk according to the COMPERA 2.0 four-stratum model
* Clinical indication for therapeutic escalation
* Availability for follow-up assessment between 3 and 6 months after randomization
* Ability to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
* Participation in another interventional clinical trial that mandates treatment modification
* Known contraindication to prostacyclin pathway agents (including iloprost or selexipag)
* Known contraindication to sildenafil dose escalation
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Women of childbearing potential not using effective contraception
* Any clinical condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would interfere with study participation or outcome assessment
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Improvement in Risk Stratification According to the COMPERA 2.0 Four-Stratum Model
Timeframe: Between 3 and 6 months after randomization (assessment closest to 6 months within the predefined window)