Effectiveness and Safety of Mirikizumab in Patients With Moderate-to-severe Ulcerative Colitis: a… (NCT07695636) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Effectiveness and Safety of Mirikizumab in Patients With Moderate-to-severe Ulcerative Colitis: a Real-life Retrospective Multicenter Study
Italy282 participantsStarted 2024-01-01
Plain-language summary
This is a real-life, multicenter, retrospective observational study with the aim to evaluate effectiveness and safety of Mirikizumab in a real life setting from the baseline up to manteinance at 12, 24 and 52 weeks. Patients with UC who have started mirikizumab will be included. Patients \> 18 years, with no distinction based on age, demographic group, special population, or general health status will be included. Eligible patients will be identified at each participating center among those receiving mirikizumab as part of routine clinical practice.The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment in achieving clinical remission at week 12, as well as endoscopic remission at weeks 24 and 52. The secondary objectives are to assess changes over time in clinical, biochemical, and imaging parameters. Specifically, the study will evaluate changes in bowel urgency as measured by the Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), as well as changes in fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels from baseline to weeks 12, 24, and 52.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Established diagnosis of UC according to the current ECCO Guidelines;
. Age ≥18 years old;
. Patients must have received mirikizumab as UC treatment, as per clinical practice;
. At least 12 weeks follow-up visits after baseline;
Exclusion criteria
. Diagnosis of undetermined IBD, CD or other gastrointestinal inflammatory conditions;
. Age \< 18 years-old;
. Acute severe IBD complications necessitating hospitalization at baseline;
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.