This cross-sectional study investigates whether the use of nicotine pouches is associated with poorer mental and physical well-being and increased school absence among Danish adolescents. The study population comprises 13-18-year-old students from public schools in Aarhus Municipality, Denmark, who completed two school-based questionnaires between September 2020 and June 2022: (1) the Aarhus Municipality Questionnaire (AMQ), including items on nicotine use, and (2) the Danish National Well-being Questionnaire (DNWQ), a 40-item instrument assessing different domains of school-related well-being. Questionnaire data are linked at the individual level to national administrative registers via the Danish Civil Registration System. Exposure is defined as current use of nicotine pouches based on AMQ responses. Adolescents who report using "snus" (slang for nicotine pouches) "not every day, but every week" or "every day" are classified as nicotine pouch users. Non-exposed adolescents are those who report no use or less than weekly use; individuals who choose "I do not wish to answer" are categorized as "undisclosed" and excluded from primary analyses. The primary outcomes are: (1) a composite mental and physical well-being score derived from 10 DNWQ items (Likert scales recoded to a 1-5 range, summed to a total score from 10 to 50) and (2) days of school absence (overall, and by illegal vs. sickness-related absence) obtained from national education registers. Secondary outcomes include item-level response patterns for the 10 DNWQ items and subgroup analyses of the association between nicotine pouch use and well-being across strata of socioeconomic status, age, sex, origin, and mental illness in the adolescent or their caregivers. Covariates are drawn from questionnaires and national registers and include age, sex, e-cigarette and cigarette use, family structure, household education, household income, immigration status, and psychiatric diagnoses in the adolescent and household providers. Descriptive statistics will compare baseline characteristics between nicotine pouch users and non-users. Primary analyses will apply linear mixed-effects models for the continuous well-being score and generalized linear mixed models with log link (Poisson or negative binomial) for counts of school absence, with and without adjustment for key confounders (age, sex, household education, household income, origin). Missing covariate data will be addressed using multiple imputation by chained equations under a missing-at-random assumption. Effect modification will be explored by stratified analyses and interaction terms. The study will provide novel, population-based evidence on the potential mental, physical, and educational consequences of nicotine pouch use among adolescents, informing clinicians, public health professionals, and policymaker
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Mental and physical well-being score
Timeframe: During school hours in school year 2020/2021 and/or 2021/2022
Days of illegal school absence and due to sickness
Timeframe: During school year 2020/2021 and/or 2021/2022