This Study Aims to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lumateperone and Cariprazine in Patients Wi… (NCT07676669) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingPhase 4
This Study Aims to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lumateperone and Cariprazine in Patients With Bipolar I Depression Using Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Severity Scale (CGI-BP-S) and Recording Treatment Emergent Adverse Effects.
140 participantsStarted 2026-12
Plain-language summary
This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of lumateperone and cariprazine as adjuncts in patients with depression associated with bipolar I using standardized efficacy assessment tools such as the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Clinical Global Impression bipolar severity scale (CGI-BP-S) and recording treatment emergent adverse effect.
Participants will undergo baseline assessment on day 0 using these scales. Follow-up assessments using MADRS and CGI scales will be conducted at Day 15, Day 30 and Day 45. Safety analysis will be performed for all participants who receive at least one dose of study medication. Vitals and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) will be recorded at every visit
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 60 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Patients aged 18-60 years
* Diagnosed with bipolar I depression according to DSM-5 criteria
* On stable dose of mood stabilizer (lithium or valproate) for at least 2 weeks
* Moderate to severe depressive symptoms (baseline MADRS score ≥20)
* Willing to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
* • Current manic or mixed episode
* Rapid cycling bipolar disorder
* Substance use disorder
* Severe neurological illness or medical emergency
* Pregnancy or lactation
* Treatment-resistant depression requiring ECT
* Active suicidal risk requiring emergency intervention
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score