The primary objective is to determine if the use of the colonoscopy surveillance recommendations algorithm increases the accuracy of surveillance timing recommendations compared to traditional methods. The secondary objective is to assess the time required to make surveillance recommendations with and without the algorithm, determine the efficiency gains (the average time saved per recommendation), and evaluate the opportunity cost (the financial value of the time saved).
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Accuracy of surveillance timing recommendations
Timeframe: Day 0
Time taken to answer each scenario
Timeframe: Day 0