Effect of Adding Augmented Cues /Hand Stroke Patient
Egypt50 participantsStarted 2025-08-01
Plain-language summary
This study aims to investigate the effect of adding augmented cues to conventional physical therapy intervention on hand function in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis. Fifty patients with subacute ischemic stroke will be randomly assigned to either a study group receiving augmented cue-based training in addition to conventional physical therapy or a control group receiving conventional physical therapy alone. Hand function will be assessed before and after the intervention period using the Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT), hand grip strength measured by a dynamometer, and pressure pain threshold measured by a pressure algometer. The findings of this study may provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of augmented cue-based rehabilitation strategies in improving hand function after stroke.
Who can participate
Age range
40 Years – 60 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* \- Male and female patients.
* Age between 40 and 60 years.
* First-ever subacute ischemic stroke.
* Time since stroke between 6 weeks and 6 months.
* Unilateral upper limb involvement.
* Able to understand and follow verbal instructions.
* Medically stable and able to participate in the rehabilitation program.
* Willing to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
* \- Hemorrhagic stroke.
* Bilateral stroke involvement.
* Severe cognitive impairment or severe aphasia interfering with participation.
* Severe visual or auditory deficits affecting training.
* Severe upper limb spasticity that prevents hand training.
* Other neurological disorders affecting upper limb function.
* Severe musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb.
* Participation in another rehabilitation trial during the study period.
* Unstable cardiovascular or medical conditions.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Nine-Hole peg Test (NHPT)
Timeframe: Baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment