Seasonal influenza causes morbidity in people with impaired immunity, including adults with elder ages and other comorbidities \[1\]. Standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) may induce lower hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titers and more rapid waning in these groups. High-dose IIV could generate higher and more durable serological responses, including HAI, B-cell activation and antibody magnitude, which was demonstrated in randomized trials \[2,3\]. MF59-adjuvanted IIV further enhances innate immune activation and antigen presentation, potentially broadening and strengthening responses, particularly during antigenic drift seasons \[4\]. These enhanced platforms represent biologically distinct strategies to overcome reduced vaccine responsiveness. Influenza A/H3N2 was reported as the predominant circulating strain in Taiwan. Initial antigenic characterization suggested suboptimal match between some circulating A/H3N2 viruses (the subclade K variant) and the vaccine reference strain, whereas A/H1N1 viruses appeared consistency with the circulating and vaccine-containing strain \[5\]. As of February 2026, approximately 2,300 cases of severe influenza had been confirmed during the 2025-2026 season, representing the largest epidemic in the post-COVID-19 era. In the meanwhile, both MF59-adjuvanted and high-dose influenza vaccine were firstly introduced in Taiwan for elderly people \[5\]. Previous study had demonstrated that people living HIV (PWH) might have lower humoral immune responses compared with people without HIV, even among PWH with relatively higher (defined as ≥ 350 cells/mm3) CD4 counts \[6\]. In spite of the broad use of these novel influenza vaccines in older adults and other population with immunocompromised status such as the recipient of solid organ transplantation \[7\], evidence gap exists in PWH, where vaccine responses vary by CD4 count, viral suppression, immune activation, comorbidities, and prior vaccination history. High-dose influenza vaccination has shown improved serologic outcomes versus standard dose in PWH in randomized trials \[2\], while data of MF59-adjuvanted vaccines used for PWH are lacking. Moreover, comparative serological responses, durability or effectiveness between the two vaccines (MF59 adjuvant vs high-dose) was only conducted among participants with elder age, which showed that the seroconversion rate for H3N2 among those receiving MF59-adjuvanted vaccines did not meet noninferiority criteria compared with those receiving high-dose vaccines \[8\]. Nevertheless, such data on PWH remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to compare toe immunogenicity among PWH undergoing MF59-adjuvanted or high-dose seasonal influenza vaccine.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
The vaccine response rate among participants undergoing MF59-adjuvanted and high-dose influenza vaccines at day 28
Timeframe: 1 month