The study, entitled "PotenziaMente: Cognitive Training in Aging," is a clinical trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of an individualized tablet-based cognitive training program targeting executive functions (e.g., planning, cognitive flexibility, and problem solving) in healthy older adults. Executive functions are higher-order cognitive processes that support adaptive functioning in daily life and influence other cognitive domains, such as memory. The primary aim of the study is to enhance cognitive performance, specifically executive abilities, in neurologically healthy adults aged 65 to 75 years. A secondary aim is to compare whether there are differences in the effects of two different delivery modalities of the same cognitive training program: home-based self-administration via tablet versus supervised tablet-based training in the presence of a trained researcher. Participants will undergo cognitive assessments at baseline (pre-training), immediately after the intervention (post-training), and at a 3-month follow-up. This is a randomized parallel-group interventional clinical trial with no masking. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups: a home-based cognitive training condition, in which they perform an individualized tablet-based cognitive training program targeting executive functions independently at home via a tablet application without direct supervision, or a supervised cognitive training condition, in which they perform the same individualized tablet-based cognitive training under the supervision of a trained researcher in a controlled environment. The intervention consists of two sessions per week, 1 hour per session, for 4 consecutive weeks, delivered via tablet-based exercises. The study uses a parallel assignment model with a prospective time perspective and a primary purpose of treatment (cognitive enhancement / prevention of cognitive decline). The primary outcome is the change in executive functions from baseline to post-intervention, assessed using standardized neuropsychological tests. Secondary outcomes include between-group differences (home-based vs supervised) in executive function performance, changes in global cognitive functioning from baseline to post-intervention, and maintenance of cognitive effects at the 3-month follow-up.
Age range
65 Years – 75 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
The Tower of London Test (Bruni et al. 2020)
Timeframe: 0-4 months
Frontal Assessment Battery (Apollonio et al., 2005)
Timeframe: 0-4 months