Evaluation of Corrective Surgery Versus Dental Implants in Compromised Mandibular Molars (NCT07633834) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
Evaluation of Corrective Surgery Versus Dental Implants in Compromised Mandibular Molars
28 participantsStarted 2027-01-01
Plain-language summary
This study seeks to assess the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes of hemisection versus implant over a 12 months period, generating robust evidence to guide clinical decision-making and enhance patient care.
Who can participate
Age range
21 Years – 60 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Good oral hygiene and motivation for follow-up care.
* Ability to understand and sign informed consent.
* Localized Root/Periodontal Disease: Severe attachment loss or bone loss (e.g., severe localized periodontitis) affecting the mesial root, while the other root remains healthy.
* Furcation Involvement: Class II or III furcation involvements where the disease cannot be treated by conventional methods.
* Vertical root fracture confined to the mesial root.
* Non-treatable perforation in the mesial root.
* Extensive sub-gingival root caries affecting the mesial root.
* Extensive un-treatable internal and external root resorption related to the mesial root.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Uncontrolled systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes mellitus, bleeding disorders, immunosuppression).
* Fused or poorly shaped roots,
* Active periodontal or endodontic infection at adjacent teeth that may interfere with treatment outcomes.
* Severe bruxism or occlusal parafunction.
* History of radiation therapy in the head and neck region.
* Pregnancy or lactation.
* Poor compliance or inability to attend follow-up visits.
* Smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.