This study aims to compare the effects of the Pecha Kucha and PowerPoint presentation methods on menopause knowledge and beliefs in menopause-related myths. By introducing an innovative, concise, focused, and visually based approach to menopause education, this research is expected to strengthen health literacy, reduce myths, and contribute to the development of more positive attitudes toward menopause among women. Furthermore, by evaluating both menopause myths and different educational techniques together, this study is anticipated to be the first in the literature and to serve as a reference for future research.
Research questions:
1. Does menopause-related knowledge increase among women who receive education using the Pecha Kucha technique and the PowerPoint method?
2. Do beliefs in menopause-related myths decrease among women who receive education using the Pecha Kucha technique and the PowerPoint method?
3. Is there a difference between the Pecha Kucha technique and the PowerPoint method in terms of women's menopause-related knowledge levels and their beliefs in menopause-related myths?
Who can participate
Age range
30 Years – 65 Years
Sex
FEMALE
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Being between 30 and 65 years of age (the lower age limit of 30 years was determined to establish a methodological threshold between young adulthood, in which menopause perception has not yet developed, and the menopausal transition period)
* Being female
* Volunteering to participate in the study
* Not having previously received education about menopause
* Being able to use technological devices
* Being able to understand Turkish
Exclusion Criteria:
* Being outside the 30-65 age range
* Having a history of prior menopause-related education or formal training
* Having cognitive, psychiatric, or medical conditions that could impair the ability to understand and complete the study procedures or questionnaires
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.