Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pulsed Electric Field Ablation for the Treatment of Pancreatic Neopl… (NCT07619417) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pulsed Electric Field Ablation for the Treatment of Pancreatic Neoplasms
United States12 participantsStarted 2026-08-01
Plain-language summary
This clinical trial tests the safety and feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pulsed electric field ablation for the treatment of pancreatic neoplasms. Pancreatic cancer is a fatal disease that is difficult to diagnose at an early stage. The approach for pancreatic neoplasm treatment has changed and the recognition of minimally invasive treatments is growing. One such minimally invasive treatment, known as endoscopic ultrasound-guided pulsed electric field ablation, offers an alternative to surgery for managing certain precancerous or high-risk pancreatic cysts. The Aliya Pulsed Electric Field system uses brief, strong bursts of electricity, delivered through a thin needle, to destroy targeted tissue, such as tumors, without using heat. These electric pulses damage only the cells inside the treatment zone, leaving the healthy tissues and important nearby structures unharmed. This makes the treatment safer and less likely to cause harm to sensitive areas around the tumor. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pulsed electric field ablation may be safe and feasible for the treatment of pancreatic neoplasms.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Age \> 18 years
* A diagnosis of a pancreatic neoplasm confirmed by EUS-fine needle aspiration (FNA) - (a) pancreatic cystic lesion such as intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), (b) World Health Organization (WHO) grade I neuroendocrine tumor
* Lesion size estimation by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or EUS: (a) pancreatic cystic lesion such as IPMN - at least 2 cm in diameter. (b) WHO grade I neuroendocrine tumor - at least 1 cm in diameter
* The patient is not a surgical candidate. Common clinical scenarios include -
* Cirrhosis of the liver (common clinical scenario)
* Advanced (≥ 75 years) age (common clinical scenario)
* Morbid obesity
* Significant cardiorespiratory comorbidity
* Patient's choice (patient elects for non-surgical management)
* Other significant comorbid conditions that impose prohibitive surgical risks
* The patient prefers non-surgical management after consultation with hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery
* For pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) and all pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs): Estimated life expectancy of at least 1 year
* Capable of giving written informed consent or has a legally authorized representative (LAR) to consent for them
* Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test (serum/urine) on the day of treatment. Pregnancy testing is the routine standard of care practice in the endos…
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Incidence of procedure-related adverse events
Timeframe: From start of procedure, up to 30 days post procedure
2
Technical success rate (feasibility)
Timeframe: At post-procedure and 1 calendar year after endoscopic ultrasound-guided pulsed electric field ablation (EUS-PEF)
Trial details
NCT IDNCT07619417
SponsorOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Sponsor typeOTHER
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Primary completion2027-12-31
Contact for this trial
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center