Comparison of a Short Modified Metal Stent Versus Plastic Stent as a Bridge to Surgery in Pancrea… (NCT07606430) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
Comparison of a Short Modified Metal Stent Versus Plastic Stent as a Bridge to Surgery in Pancreatic Cancer With Malignant Biliary Obstruction
116 participantsStarted 2026-05-01
Plain-language summary
This study is a multicenter, randomized clinical trial designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of a modified 8-mm fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) with a conventional plastic stent for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with pancreatic cancer and malignant biliary obstruction.
In patients who require biliary drainage before surgery, stent placement is commonly performed using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, the optimal stent type remains uncertain.
Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the modified FCSEMS or a plastic stent. The primary objective is to evaluate the rate of stent-related complications requiring reintervention before surgery. Secondary outcomes include stent patency, adverse events, and surgical outcomes.
The results of this study are expected to help determine the most appropriate stent strategy for patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic cancer.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Age ≥ 18 years
. Patients with resectable, borderline resectable, or locally advanced pancreatic cancer with distal malignant biliary obstruction requiring endoscopic biliary drainage
. Biliary stricture located ≥ 2 cm below the hepatic hilum
. Serum bilirubin ≥ 3 mg/dL
. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2
. Ability to provide written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Stent-Related Non-Event Rate at Surgery
Timeframe: From stent placement to the time of surgery