Comparative Efficacy of Intralesional Tranexamic Acid Versus Mandelic Acid Peel in the Treatment … (NCT07604844) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
Comparative Efficacy of Intralesional Tranexamic Acid Versus Mandelic Acid Peel in the Treatment of Melasma
Pakistan120 participantsStarted 2026-05
Plain-language summary
Melasma is a chronic acquired disorder of facial hyperpigmentation that significantly affects quality of life. Both intralesional tranexamic acid and mandelic acid chemical peels are effective treatment options with favorable safety profiles in darker skin types. However, comparative evidence in South Asian populations is limited. This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, quality of life outcomes, and patient satisfaction of intralesional tranexamic acid versus mandelic acid peel in patients with facial melasma treated at Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 45 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 18-45 years. Clinical diagnosis of facial melasma. Fitzpatrick skin phototypes III-V. Disease duration of at least 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
Pregnancy or lactation. Known hypersensitivity to tranexamic acid or mandelic acid. Active facial dermatoses or infection. Personal or family history of thromboembolic disease. Coagulation disorders. Systemic retinoid use within 6 months. Oral contraceptive or hormone replacement therapy within 6 months. Use of topical or systemic depigmenting agents within 4 weeks. History of keloid tendency.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Proportion of participants achieving a Physician Global Assessment rating of good or excellent.