Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Prior Uterine Artery Cauterization From the Origin Versus Co… (NCT07601971) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Prior Uterine Artery Cauterization From the Origin Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
44 participantsStarted 2026-05-15
Plain-language summary
The main goal of this study is to compare between total Laparoscopic hysterectomy proceeded by Uterine artery cauterization at its origin and conventional total Laparoscopic hysterectomy regarding: bleeding , operative time , intra operative time and follow up post operative.
Who can participate
Age range
35 Years – 55 Years
Sex
FEMALE
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria: Age of the patient is more than 35 y . Non malignant pathologies including fibroids, endometrial hyperplasia, Dysfunctional Uterine bleeding not responding to medical treatment.
Good general condition of the patient ( American society of Anesthesiologists "ASA" score 1 , 2 , 3 ( Horvath et al ,. 2021) .
Uterine size is less than 20 weeks by fundal level . -
Exclusion Criteria:Age of the patient is less than 35 y . Gynecological malignancies . Contraindications for laparoscopy as any medical condition worsens by peumo peritoneum or Trendelenburg position as severely compromised cardiopulmonary status .
Patients with American society of Anesthesiologists score 4 or more . ( Horvath et al ,. 2021) Uterine size is more than 20 weeks by fundal level .
\-
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Is to compare peri operative blood loss by counting amount of blood in ml drained by suction , operation time between Conventional TLH and TLH with prior occlusion to UAs at its origin
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgery
2
Is to compare peri operative blood loss , operation time between Conventional TLH and TLH with prior occlusion to UAs at its origin