Comparative Effects of Perturbation-Based Balance Training on Firm Surface and Rolling Board for Diabetic Neuropathy Patients

Plain-language summary

The present study is designed to compare the effectiveness of perturbation-based balance training performed on two different surfaces, stable (firm surface) and unstable (rolling board), for enhancing static, dynamic, and reactive balance in individuals diagnosed with diabetic neuropathy. This randomized clinical trial will recruit a total of 42 participants, with the sample size calculated using Epi Tool software. A consecutive sampling technique will be implemented. Eligible participants who fulfill the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned into two equal groups (n = 21 each) through an online randomization method. Participants in Group A will undergo perturbation-based balance exercises on a stable surface, whereas participants in Group B will receive similar training on a rolling board to introduce surface instability. In addition to the primary intervention, both groups will receive contrast bath therapy as a standard baseline treatment. Written as well as verbal informed consent will be obtained prior to participation. The intervention protocol will span four weeks, consisting of three sessions per week on alternate days, resulting in a total of twelve treatment sessions. The primary outcomes will focus on balance performance and fall risk. These outcomes will be measured using the Berg Balance Scale, the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, and the Timed Up and Go test. Screening for diabetic neuropathy will be carried out using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument. Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS version 23.

Who can participate

What they're measuring

Trial details