Easy Hands: Impact of a 3-Step Versus WHO 6-Step Hand Hygiene Technique on Healthcare-Associated … (NCT07593417) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Easy Hands: Impact of a 3-Step Versus WHO 6-Step Hand Hygiene Technique on Healthcare-Associated Infections in Intensive Care and Hospitalization Units.
Colombia1,027 participantsStarted 2025-09-01
Plain-language summary
Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) remain a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs worldwide. Hand hygiene is the cornerstone of infection prevention; however, adherence to the full WHO 6-step hand hygiene technique may be limited in routine clinical practice due to time constraints and workflow barriers. Simplified hand hygiene approaches may improve compliance while preserving clinical effectiveness.
The Easy Hands study is a pragmatic cluster randomized cross-over trial designed to compare a simplified 3-step hand hygiene technique with the standard WHO 6-step technique in clinical care units. Hospital services were randomized to one of two sequences of intervention and crossed over after the first study period. The primary objective is to evaluate whether the simplified 3-step technique is associated with differences in time to first healthcare-associated infection among hospitalized patients.
Who can participate
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Admission to a participating cluster during an active intervention period.
* Adult or pediatric hospitalized patient.
* Availability of admission and discharge dates.
* Eligibility for institutional infection surveillance.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Admission to Emergency Department or Operating Rooms.
* HAI present at baseline (t0).
* HAI occurring during the first two hospital days.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.