Acute Effects of Jägermeister With Energy Drinks (Jägermbomb) (NCT07588022) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingNot Applicable
Acute Effects of Jägermeister With Energy Drinks (Jägermbomb)
Spain24 participantsStarted 2026-02-18
Plain-language summary
The main objective of this study is to compare the acute effects of drinking Jägerbombs with drinking alcohol alone during a binge-drinking episode, which involves consuming a large amount of alcohol in a short period of time to become intoxicated. Secondary objectives are to assess whether Jägerbombs produce prototypical alcohol effects, increase stimulation and rewarding effects, affect coordination, time reaction and vision, change stress-related hormone responses, and cause hangover symptoms.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 45 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Men and women between 18-45 years old with a weight between 50-90 kg for men and between 55-80 kg for women, and a body mass index (BMI) between 19-28 kg/m2. Lower or higher weights or BMIs are allowed, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator or the collaborators designated by the Principal Investigator and that do not pose a risk to the subjects and do not interfere with the objectives of the study.
. Alcohol consumption in the form of occasional binge drinking (≥1 time/month), social alcohol consumption (≥10g/day distributed weekly) and experience in alcohol intoxication.
. Consumption ≥7 drinks with methylxanthines (coffee, tea, chocolate, cola, BE) per week and who have consumed ED on at least one occasion.
. Understand and agree to the trial procedures and sign an informed consent.
. History and physical examination that demonstrate no organic or psychiatric disorders.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Change in reaction time (Psychomotor Vigilance Task)
Timeframe: From baseline to 4 hours after administration
. The ECG and general blood and urine tests performed before the test should be within normal limits. Minor or punctual variations from the limits of normality are allowed if, at the discretion of the Principal Investigator, taking into account the state of science, they are not of clinical significance, do not pose a risk to the subjects and do not interfere with the assessment of the product. These variations and their non-relevance will be justified in writing in a specific way.
Exclusion criteria
. Not meeting the inclusion criteria.
. History or clinical evidence of gastrointestinal, liver, renal or other disorders that may involve an alteration in the absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of the drug, or that are suggestive of gastrointestinal irritation by drugs.
. Current history of substance use disorder according to DSM-V (except nicotine). A previous history of mild substance use disorder (corresponding to substance abuse according to DSM-IV criteria) is admitted.
. History or clinical evidence of psychiatric disorders, alcoholism, abuse of drugs or other drugs or habitual consumption of psychoactive drugs.
. Have participated in clinical trials with drugs or nutraceuticals in the previous 12 weeks.