Fluorescent Leukocytes as a Marker of Early Sepsis/Severity (NCT07585942) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
Fluorescent Leukocytes as a Marker of Early Sepsis/Severity
France492 participantsStarted 2026-05-12
Plain-language summary
Sepsis is a medical emergency whose prognosis depends on the early identification of patients at risk of septic shock, but the tools available in the Emergency Department remain insufficient. Neutrophils, key players in immunothrombosis, show alterations detectable via cell fluorescence (e.g., NE-SFL), which are strongly correlated with the severity of sepsis and septic DIC. The FLAMES study will evaluate, from the time of admission to the Emergency Department, the relevance of neutrophil fluorescence as an early biomarker of severity, either alone or integrated into an AI model based on the multiparametric data from the SthemA 801, with comparison to the Sysmex XN. It aims to address an unmet clinical need: the immediate stratification of the risk of severe forms of sepsis. Hypothesis: higher initial fluorescence will identify patients at risk of organ failure, septic shock, or DIC.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Admission to the ED
* Suspected or proven infection defined by the prescription of antibiotic therapy within 24 hours following admission to the ED
* Collection of an EDTA blood sample as part of routine care
* Patient informed and has not expressed opposition
Exclusion Criteria:
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Legal protection measure (guardianship, curatorship, judicial protection)
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Evaluate the association between neutrophil fluorescence, whether isolated or integrated into an AI model based on CBC results combined with the advanced multiparametric capabilities of the SthemA 801 analyzer