Holmium Laser Enucleation Of the Prostate Versus Water Vapor Therapy Of The Prostate on Sexual Fu… (NCT07566689) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Holmium Laser Enucleation Of the Prostate Versus Water Vapor Therapy Of The Prostate on Sexual Function and Ejaculation
Egypt110 participantsStarted 2024-04-03
Plain-language summary
This study aims to compare the effect of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) versus water vapor therapy (Rezum) on sexual function and ejaculation in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a common condition affecting aging men and may lead to lower urinary tract symptoms requiring surgical intervention. While both HoLEP and Rezum are effective minimally invasive treatments, their impact on sexual function, particularly ejaculation, remains an important concern.
Participants will be assigned to undergo either HoLEP or Rezum therapy. Sexual function and ejaculatory outcomes will be evaluated using validated questionnaires before and after treatment. The study aims to determine which modality provides better preservation of sexual function while maintaining clinical efficacy.
Who can participate
Age range
50 Years
Sex
MALE
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Male patients aged 50 years or older
* Diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
* Presence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)
* International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥ 13
* Peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) ≤ 15 mL/s
* Failure of medical therapy for BPH
* Sexually active and in a stable relationship
Exclusion Criteria:
* History of prostate cancer
* Prior prostate surgery
* Neurogenic bladder dysfunction
* Urethral stricture disease
* Active urinary tract infection
* Severe comorbidities contraindicating surgery
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.