This study evaluates our team's urology-specific AI (UroMed AI Doctor) for its safety, professionalism, knowledge and Q\&A ability, and tests its effectiveness against traditional manual urology care, to confirm if it can be a safe auxiliary tool and improve patients' preoperative experience. Before the study, we will test the AI with urology questions, compare it to international AI models (DeepSeek, ChatGPT, Google Gemini), and have two senior chief physicians evaluate it. In the clinical trial, patients at The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University will be randomly split into two groups: AI-assisted care or traditional care by a specialist. Two senior specialists will evaluate both groups blindly; each group will get preoperative education (AI or physician), with anxiety and satisfaction surveyed. Subsequently, a multi-center validation will be conducted with 11 domestic and international hospitals.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Comprehension of Medical Cases
Timeframe: Baseline Day 1
Adherence to Medical Guidelines and Consensus
Timeframe: Baseline Day 1
Clinical Reasoning
Timeframe: Baseline Day 1
Relevance of Differential Diagnoses
Timeframe: Baseline Day 1
Diagnostic Acceptability
Timeframe: Baseline Day 1
Presence of Unrealistic Content
Timeframe: Baseline Day 1
Bias and Unfairness
Timeframe: Baseline Day 1
Potential Harm
Timeframe: Baseline Day 1