Kinematic vs Mechanical Alignment in High Tibial Osteotomy (NCT07551089) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
Kinematic vs Mechanical Alignment in High Tibial Osteotomy
100 participantsStarted 2026-04-01
Plain-language summary
To compare between kinematic and mechanichal alignment after High Tibial Osteotomy (clinically and radiologically)
Who can participate
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Clinical: 1. Age : Adult with symptomatic osteoarthritic varus knee 2-Medial knee pain with functional limitation ≥6 months despite optimized non-operative care.
Radiological: 1- Medial compartment OA in Xray AP-Lateral view 2-Degree of varus ≥3 and ≤15 degree in long film(full-length, standing hip-to-ankle radiographs) 3-•Varus knee (mpta ≤85 degree and ldfa ≤93 and jlca ≤5)
Physical : 1-Range of motion: Flexion ≥110°, flexion contracture ≤10°, extension lag ≤5°.
2-Gait testing: Able to walk unaided (or with standard aid) for instrumented gait analysis.
Exclusion Criteria:
* 1- Predominantly lateral compartment OA 2- severe patellofemoral arthritis 3- Prior high tibial osteotomy, knee arthroplasty, or complex fracture around the knee 4-Inflammatory arthropathies (eg, rheumatoid arthritis) 5- end stage medial compartment osteoarthritis with bone erosions 6-chondrocalcinosis