A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of Topical Tacrolimus 0.03% … (NCT07519174) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of Topical Tacrolimus 0.03% Versus Crisaborole 2% in Patients With Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis Over 8 Weeks
Pakistan72 participantsStarted 2026-06-01
Plain-language summary
This randomized controlled trial compares the effectiveness and safety of topical tacrolimus 0.03% and crisaborole 2% in patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis over 8 weeks. Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition affecting quality of life, and steroid-sparing treatments are increasingly preferred due to adverse effects of long-term corticosteroid use. Tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor, and crisaborole, a PDE-4 inhibitor, are both effective alternatives, though tacrolimus may offer greater efficacy while crisaborole has better tolerability. The study will include 70 patients aged 2-20 years, randomized into two groups receiving either treatment. Outcomes will be assessed using EASI score reduction and adverse effects. Data will be analyzed statistically to determine significance. The study aims to generate local evidence to guide treatment decisions and improve management strategies for atopic dermatitis in the Pakistani population.
Who can participate
Age range
2 Years – 20 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 2-20 years Clinically diagnosed mild to moderate AD EASI score ≤21 Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Severe AD (EASI \>21) Use of topical/systemic corticosteroids within 2 weeks Secondary infection Known drug hypersensitivity Immunocompromised state
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.