Despite these advances, CBCT interpretation remains largely qualitative and dependent on the clinician's experience. Conventional evaluation is based on two-dimensional slices and linear measurements, which may underestimate lesion complexity and spatial distribution. Recent developments in Artificial Intelligence in Medicine have introduced automated image segmentation tools capable of identifying lesion boundaries and calculating volumetric data. These technologies allow a transition from subjective assessment to objective, reproducible quantification. The potential clinical advantages include: * Objective measurement of lesion size (volume in mm³) * Improved surgical planning * Enhanced prediction of anatomical involvement * Reduction of diagnostic errors * Standardization of follow-up and outcome assessment Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical impact of AI-based segmentation and volumetric analysis of endosseous lesions compared to conventional CBCT interpretation.
Age range
18 Years – 80 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Time required for CBCT interpretation (minutes)
Timeframe: Day 1