This study aims to compare slow-resorbing and fast-resorbing sutures used after the surgical extraction of lower third molars. Sutures are routinely placed after wisdom tooth removal to promote hemostasis. Slow-resorbing and fast-resorbing sutures differ mainly in how long they remain in place, and fast-resorbing sutures often do not require removal. The study evaluates whether these two types of sutures differ in terms of microbiological contamination. Patient-reported inflammation, swelling, and postoperative discomfort will also be assessed. Each participant will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two suture types. Only routine clinical procedures are involved. Participation includes several standard visits: initial medical and dental history collection with oral and radiographic examination; the surgical extraction of the lower third molar; suture removal at 7 days. No additional invasive procedures are required. Participants will receive a daily diary to record pain levels and any pain medication taken during the first postoperative week. At the 7-day visit, wound healing will be evaluated and sutures will be removed, collected and anonymously analyzed by the University Microbiology Laboratory. This study seeks to provide useful information about the clinical performance and microbiological behavior of different types of resorbable sutures commonly used in oral surgery, with the goal of improving patient care and postoperative outcomes.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Microbiological evaluation of the sutures
Timeframe: Evaluation will be conducted at the removal of the sutures (7 days after surgery)