Trial of Underwater Versus Gas-Insufflation Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal DisseEtion (NCT07490574) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Trial of Underwater Versus Gas-Insufflation Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal DisseEtion
Italy295 participantsStarted 2024-12-01
Plain-language summary
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc resection of large superficial colorectal neoplasia but remains technically demanding and may be limited by suboptimal visualization, intraprocedural bleeding, smoke accumulation, and prolonged procedural time. Underwater ESD (UESD), performed under saline immersion rather than gas insufflation, has been proposed as a strategy to improve the operative field and facilitate submucosal dissection.
This prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial was designed to compare UESD with conventional gas-assisted ESD (GESD) for colorectal neoplasia referred for ESD across Italian tertiary centers. The primary objective was to assess non-inferiority of UESD versus GESD in terms of en bloc resection. Secondary objectives included comparison of histological resection quality, procedural efficiency, intraprocedural events, procedural field visualization, and post-procedural adverse events.
Who can participate
Age range
19 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
Adults aged 19 years or older
Colorectal neoplastic lesion referred for endoscopic submucosal dissection
Lesion considered amenable to en bloc endoscopic resection by ESD according to expert pre-procedural endoscopic assessment
Written informed consent provided
Exclusion Criteria:
Known or suspected deep invasive neoplasia
Inflammatory bowel disease
Uninterrupted antithrombotic therapy
Known coagulopathy
Any clinical or lesion-related condition considered unsuitable for colorectal ESD by the treating endoscopist
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.