Comparative Evaluation of Topical 30% Metformin and Kligman's Regimen in Women With Melasma (NCT07485777) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
Comparative Evaluation of Topical 30% Metformin and Kligman's Regimen in Women With Melasma
Pakistan82 participantsStarted 2026-07-01
Plain-language summary
It's a prospective, randomised, assessor-blinded clinical study comparing topical 30% metformin with Kligman's regimen for melasma in women aged 35-55 years at Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi. The study seeks to ascertain which treatment yields a more significant decrease in the modified MASI score over an 8-week period and which treatment is associated with fewer adverse effects, such as erythema, burning, peeling, and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. A total of 82 participants will be enrolled and randomly assigned to either metformin cream or Kligman's regimen, with both groups also using sunscreen. Assessments will be done at baseline, week 4, and week 8 through mMASI scoring, photographs, and side-effect monitoring. Data will be analyzed in SPSS 26 using t-tests and chi-square testing. The study is based on evidence suggesting metformin may offer comparable efficacy with better tolerability.
Who can participate
Age range
35 Years – 55 Years
Sex
FEMALE
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Female patients aged 35-55 years
* Clinically diagnosed epidermal or dermal melasma (confirmed by Wood's lamp examination)
* Fitzpatrick skin types III-V
* Duration of melasma ≥6 months
* No topical or systemic treatment for melasma in the past month
Exclusion Criteria:
* Pregnancy or lactation
* Known allergy to study medications
* Active facial dermatitis, acne, or recent cosmetic procedures
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.