Laparoscopic Versus Open Nephrectomy : Clinical Effectivness and Cost Analysis (NCT07461090) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingNot Applicable
Laparoscopic Versus Open Nephrectomy : Clinical Effectivness and Cost Analysis
Egypt60 participantsStarted 2026-02
Plain-language summary
To evaluate and compare clinical effectiveness (operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, complications and etc) and cost analysis' between laparoscopic nephrectomy and open nephrectomy .
Who can participate
Age range1 Year
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* American Society of Anesthesiology score 1-3.
* Indication for :
* Simple total nephrectomy or hemi nephrectomy: benign chronic inflammatory non-functioning kidney
* Partial nephrectomy: localized renal mass ≤7 cm suitable for nephron-sparing surgery.
* Radical nephrectomy or Radical nephrouretrectomy with bladder cuff: localized renal tumor requiring complete nephrectomy without major vascular invasion.
* Patient deemed fit for general anesthesia and surgery.
* Patient provides written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
* emergency surgery, dialysis-dependent patients, planned hybrid procedures.
* Patients with incomplete data
* Patients with metastatic disease at presentation.
* Prior extensive ipsilateral retroperitoneal surgery or severe adhesions precluding Laparoscopy.
* Need for concomitant major procedures (eg, large bowel resection) at index operation.
* Locally advanced tumor with obvious major vascular involvement requiring complex vascular reconstruction.
* Uncorrected coagulopathy.
* Pregnancy or Obese patient (BMI \> 40)
* Inability to provide informed consent or comply with follow-up.