Background: Very preterm babies are at high risk for developmental disorders. Prechtl's General Movements (GMs) Assessment is a valuable and reliable tool in infants until three months corrected age for predicting their further developmental difficulties, particularly cerebral palsy. However, a specific therapeutic intervention based on this assessment, has not yet been defined. Soloveichick et al. (2019) described the Movement Imitation Therapy for Preterm Babies (MIT-PB) as a promising novel approach based on the model of GMs and the current knowledge of brain development. Study design and objectives: The present pilot prospective controlled intervention study aims to clarify whether preterm infants born with a gestational age (GA) \<32 0/7 weeks showing abnormal GMs at 33-34 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) differ in their neurodevelopmental outcome at three and 24 months corrected age depending on whether they were treated with usual care physiotherapy or additionally with MIT-PB. Methods: The participants are recruited at two study sights over 18 months, whereby 40 participants per group are estimated. MIT-PB starts at the NICU and is continued until 52 weeks PMA. The parents are introduced in the method in order to take over a part of the treatment right from the beginning and continue after discharge. The essential content of MIT-PB is to manually guide the infant's abnormal movements into movements as similar as possible to normal GMs. The primary outcome is the Motor Optimality Score Revised (MOS-R) at three months corrected age. The analysis for the primary endpoint (MOS-R at T2) will be conducted using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with the treatment group (intervention/control) as fixed factor and GMOS at T0 (baseline) as covariate. Several covariates are included in the analysis. Furthermore, neuromotor outcome at term (GMOS) and at two years corrected age (Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III), as well as parental self-efficacy (Perceived Maternal Parental Self-efficacy tool(PMP S-E)) and dose-response of MIT-PB are evaluated.
Age range
23 Weeks – 32 Weeks
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Motor Optimality Score for 3- to 5-Month-Old Infants - Revised (Einspieler et al. 2019)
Timeframe: at three months corrected age