In the pediatric field, especially in newborns, the appearance of pressure ulcers is a very frequent event, with prolonged hospitalization, increased costs and worsening of the newborn's clinical picture National data on the prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers (LP) are not easily available, especially if referred to pediatric and neonatal settings; However, there are guidelines and recommendations issued by scientific societies based on national data on an adult population. The guidelines produced by NPUAP and EPUAP underline the importance of using a tool to assess the risk of pressure ulcers that includes, among the items, the presence of a device as a favorable factor. However, the scales most used in the pediatric/neonatal field for risk assessment do not include it. These scales are the Braden Q Scale, the Glamorgan Scale and the NSRAS The overall objective of this Single-Centre Observational study is to describe the validity and reliability of the Braden QD Scale (Italian version) in the neonatal population. Population enrolled: Newborns who will be part of the Braden QD Scale validation study will be placed in the standard Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) setting; they will then be admitted to the OU in a thermocot, cot or neonatal island. All devices are provided with an anti-decubitus mattress certified by the manufacturers; in addition, all newborns are placed under the head with a water or gel mattress to further reduce the risk of pressure injury. * Newborns admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) who are less than 28 days old at the time of admission, * Newborns with a body weight of less than 5 kg, at the time of admission The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is the Braden QD Scale the optimal instrument for detecting the risk of pressure injury, in such a complex context as that of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit? * Can the Braden QD Scale detect and measure the risk of pressure injuries from devices placed on the Neonate?
Age range
28 Days
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
.Braden QDS Linguistic-cultural validation (Italian Version)
Timeframe: Study duration 21 months Enrolment duration 18 months Planned monitoring is quarterly and internal