Comparison of Standard ACL Reconstruction Versus TARS-Augmented Reconstruction (NCT07418476) | Clinical Trial Compass
Active — Not RecruitingNot Applicable
Comparison of Standard ACL Reconstruction Versus TARS-Augmented Reconstruction
Turkey (Türkiye)80 participantsStarted 2026-02-28
Plain-language summary
This study is designed to compare standard anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring autograft with ACL reconstruction augmented using the Tape Active Reconstruction System (TARS). Eligible patients aged 18 to 44 years with a complete ACL rupture will be prospectively enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two study groups. Participants will be evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at regular follow-up visits, with the final assessment performed at 12 months after surgery. Outcome assessments will include patient-reported outcome measures, objective clinical examination of knee stability, instrumented laxity measurements, and radiological evaluation.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 45 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 18 and 44 years
* Diagnosis of complete ACL rupture confirmed by clinical examination and imaging
* Planned primary single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft
* Intact contralateral knee
* Provision of written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Cartilage lesions grade 2 or higher according to the Outerbridge classification
* Combined ligament injuries or inflammatory arthritis
* Tibial slope greater than 12 degrees
* Advanced knee laxity
* Revision ACL reconstruction
* Requirement for additional surgical procedures during the same operation
* Inability to comply with follow-up protocol
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Side to side difference in anterior tibial translation (mm)
Timeframe: Preoperative and 12 months postoperatively