This study aims to compare 2 different groups of patients with both a healed site in the upper posterior sector after extractions, one treated with ultra-short implants, and another with long implants with bone regeneration. The objective is to evaluate if short-implants are superior in terms of better clinical outcomes, survival rates and safety, reduced surgical time, postoperative discomfort, and complication risk compared to conventional implants and bone regeneration.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Satisfaction of the surgical procedure
Timeframe: The day of the intervention after the surgery is finalized