Comparing Between Osseodensification Burs Versus Osteotome in Low Bone Density Areas. (NCT07378020) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Comparing Between Osseodensification Burs Versus Osteotome in Low Bone Density Areas.
Egypt13 participantsStarted 2024-01-05
Plain-language summary
The objective of this study is to compare the primary stability of implant sites prepared using conventional drilling, osseodensification (Densah bur), and osteotome preparation techniques, and to evaluate the influence of these methods on implant success rates in areas of low bone density.
Who can participate
Age range
35 Years – 65 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Patients with low bone density (D3), (D4) Missing maxillary posterior teeth
* edentulous ridge should be 8 mm or more of bone height and bone width ≥ 7mm with adequate inter-occlusal space of at least 8mm,
* Patients with good oral hygiene or willing to improve their oral hygiene.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Patients with uncontrolled medical conditions that affect Osseo-integration.
* Patients receiving medications that contraindicate osteotomy.
* Heavy smokers.
* History of receiving irradiation in the head and neck region.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
primary stability using Insertion Torque Value.
Timeframe: day of surgery
2
Primary Implant Stability measured through Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA)
Timeframe: the day of surgery
3
Secondary Implant Stability using radio frequency analysis (RFA)
Timeframe: readings were taken 3 months post operative and 6 months after loading.