CompletedNot Applicable

Comparing Between Osseodensification Burs Versus Osteotome in Low Bone Density Areas.

Egypt13 participantsStarted 2024-01-05

Plain-language summary

The objective of this study is to compare the primary stability of implant sites prepared using conventional drilling, osseodensification (Densah bur), and osteotome preparation techniques, and to evaluate the influence of these methods on implant success rates in areas of low bone density.

Who can participate

Age range35 Years – 65 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with low bone density (D3), (D4) Missing maxillary posterior teeth * edentulous ridge should be 8 mm or more of bone height and bone width ≥ 7mm with adequate inter-occlusal space of at least 8mm, * Patients with good oral hygiene or willing to improve their oral hygiene. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with uncontrolled medical conditions that affect Osseo-integration. * Patients receiving medications that contraindicate osteotomy. * Heavy smokers. * History of receiving irradiation in the head and neck region.

What they're measuring

primary stability using Insertion Torque Value.

Timeframe: day of surgery

Primary Implant Stability measured through Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA)

Timeframe: the day of surgery

Secondary Implant Stability using radio frequency analysis (RFA)

Timeframe: readings were taken 3 months post operative and 6 months after loading.

Trial details

NCT IDNCT07378020

SponsorFuture University in Egypt

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2025-01-05

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Low Bone Density trials