There are 28 non-cardiology medications from multiple families costing more than $13 billion annually in Canada, categorized as 'Known' QT-prolonging medications (QTPmeds) based on very low levels of evidence. The association between many commonly used medications listed as known QTPmeds and actual major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is weak. Meanwhile, QTPmeds-related warnings are ubiquitous in every healthcare setting, triggering 'hard stop' disruption millions of times per day to front line clinicians. Poor quality medication safety alerts are increasingly recognized as a source of inferior patient care and provider burnout which detracts from healthcare sustainability. In this study, anonymized hospital electronic medical record data from more than 990,000 adult patients across Ontario will be used to compare patients who experience MACE with those who do not, measuring their real-time exposure to QT-prolonging drugs. Additionally, machine-learning techniques will also be used to find which patient or treatment factors best predict risk. The objectives of this study are to 1) Investigate whether exposure to one or more 'Known' QTPmed is associated with an increased risk of MACE after adjusting for confounders; and 2) Identify predictors and their relative importance for QTPmeds-associated MACE. In summary, QT-prolonging medications have the potential to cause very serious adverse events, including death. However, it is not sufficiently clear which patients under which circumstances suffer events, or when is QT prolongation a useful surrogate marker for harm. Meanwhile, ubiquitous medication alerts related to QT-prolonging medications are at best imprecise and at worst, misleading, costly and potentially dangerous. Now that data resources are available with the data elements, structure and sample size required to rigorously assess this association, this study will address this question to improve patient safety, provider satisfaction and the cost-effectiveness of care.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE)
Timeframe: From first exposure to the end of hospitalization, which would typically be up to 4 weeks follow-up.