The present study has three primary objectives: (1) to evaluate the feasibility of implementing the Unified Protocol for Burnout (UP-B) an intervention derived from the Unified Protocol (Barlow et al., 2018); (2) to assess the acceptability of the intervention among both recipients and psychotherapists; and (3) to examine preliminary signals of the UP-B's efficacy. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Is the intervention feasible as indicated by recruitment rates, data collection procedures, and acceptable rates of participant retention and treatment completion? 2. Is the UP-B acceptable for both participants and psychotherapists considering content, content structure, mode of delivery, and adherence? 3. Does the UP-B show preliminary evidence of effectiveness (i.e., efficacy signals) in reducing burnout, anxiety, depression, and increasing well-being?
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Feasibility of the UP-B
Timeframe: From baseline through post-intervention and 1-month follow-up
Feasibility: Protocol fidelity (TARS-UP)
Timeframe: From baseline to post-intervention (8 weeks)
Module-Specific Acceptability (Participant Perspective)
Timeframe: After each intervention module (across the intervention period)
Module-Specific Acceptability (Psychotherapist Perspective)
Timeframe: After each intervention module (across the intervention period)
Global Acceptability
Timeframe: Post-intervention (8 weeks)
Behavioral indicators of Acceptability
Timeframe: Post-intervention (8 weeks)