The Impact of Two-Stage Turnbull-Cutait Pull-Through Coloanal Anastomosis on Stoma-free Survival … (NCT07369531) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingNot Applicable
The Impact of Two-Stage Turnbull-Cutait Pull-Through Coloanal Anastomosis on Stoma-free Survival in Low Rectal Anal-preserving Surgery
China520 participantsStarted 2026-03-18
Plain-language summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to explore the difference in 3-year stoma-free survival between the Turnbull-Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis (TCA) surgery and the low anterior resection combined with protective stoma (LAR) surgery in patients with low rectal cancer, as well as the differences in anal function, surgical complications, and survival outcomes within 1 year after surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. Is TCA surgery superior to LAR surgery in improving the 3-year stoma-free survival of patients with low rectal cancer?
2. Are there differences in postoperative anal function (assessed by LARS score and Wexner score), quality of life (assessed by EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire), surgical complications, pathological outcomes, and long-term survival (disease-free survival, time to recurrence, overall survival) between the two surgical methods? Researchers will compare the TCA group and the LAR group to see if TCA surgery can reduce the permanent stoma rate, improve postoperative anal function and quality of life, and ensure surgical safety and favorable tumor-related outcomes compared with LAR surgery.
Participants will:
1. Be randomly assigned to either the TCA group or the LAR group in a 1:1 ratio.
2. Receive the corresponding surgical intervention.
3. Complete regular follow-ups at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, and 36 after the first surgery.
4. Provide relevant clinical data (perioperative, pathological, follow-up) as required.
Who can participate
Age range18 Years – 75 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
✓. Patients with rectal cancer aged 18-75 years confirmed by pathological biopsy as adenocarcinoma;
✓. Preoperative abdominal contrast-enhanced CT and pulmonary CT (or PET-CT) showed no evidence of distant metastasis;
✓. Preoperative rectal MRI evaluation demonstrated that the tumor was located within 5cm below the anal margin, above the intermuscular groove between the internal and external anal sphincters (anal white line) by 1 cm, and without invasion of the external anal sphincter;
✓. For tumors located above the levator ani hiatus, MRI evaluation showed cT1-3, cN0-1, M0, MRF (-); for tumors located below the levator ani hiatus, MRI evaluation showed cT1-2, cN0-1, M0, MRF (-). For patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, tumors above the levator ani hiatus were downstaged to ycT3NxM0 or below, and tumors below the levator ani hiatus were downstaged to ycT2NxM0 or below;
✓. Preoperative BMI \< 28 kg/m²
✓. Patients underwent radical laparoscopic/robot-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) or transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME).
. Patients diagnosed with concurrent primary malignant tumors in any other organ or multiple distant colorectal cancers;
✕. History of previous open surgery (non-minimally invasive procedures);
✕. Failure to undergo preoperative rectal MRI evaluation and chest/abdominal imaging assessment, resulting in incomplete clinical staging of the tumor;
✕. Pregnant patients or those with concurrent inflammatory bowel disease;
✕. Preoperative patients with complete intestinal obstruction or requiring emergency surgery;
✕. Preoperative anticipated multivisceral resection or intraoperative required combined organ resection is indicated.;
✕. Recent treatment for other malignancies;
✕. Low rectal cancer classified as type IV in the Bordeaux classification system;