Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable

AI-Based Speech Intelligibility Assessment: Efficacy & Reliability

40 participantsStarted 2026-02

Plain-language summary

compare the auditory-perceptual assessment conducted by speech-language pathologists using the U-TAP with the assessment performed via the AI solution (Blings) program in patients with speech disorders, and to evaluate the efficacy and reliability of these two methods for speech intelligibility assessment.

Who can participate

Age range

18 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 18 years or older. * Patients with neurologic disorders, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, poliomyelitis, cerebellar disorders, cerebellar lesions, and stroke. * Patients presenting with concomitant speech disorders, such as dysarthria, motor speech disorders, and voice disorders. Exclusion Criteria: * Subjects with a score of less than 16 points on the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE). * Subjects with visual, perceptual, or auditory impairments that prevent them from following the examiner's instructions. * Subjects judged by the researcher as unsuitable for participation in this clinical study due to other reasons.

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Word-level consonant accuracy (%) derived from speech samples obtained during the U-TAP assessment

Timeframe: Visit 1 (Baseline)

Trial details

NCT IDNCT07347782

SponsorPusan National University Yangsan Hospital

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeOBSERVATIONAL

Primary completion2026-12-31

Contact for this trial

Jisoo Baik

082+055-360-4159 zisoo@pusan.ac.kr

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Patients With Speech Disorders trials