Study type: Multicenter retrospective cohort study with prospective validation Primary purpose: To determine whether an individualized, imaging-guided treatment algorithm Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) vs endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) improves 2-year neurodevelopmental outcomes in children \<18 y with congenital hydrocephalus. Main questions * Does ETV produce higher 6-month surgical success and lower 2-year re-intervention rates than VPS in prespecified subgroups (age ≥3 y, obstructive hydrocephalus, normal basal cisterns)? * Does a machine-learning model (ETV-PS) using pre-operative MRI features accurately predict ETV success (AUC ≥0.80) and thereby reduce unnecessary re-operations? * Does early, frequent programmable-valve pressure adjustment after VPS decrease over-shunting headaches and improve 2-year cognitive scores compared with standard, infrequent adjustment? Comparison: ETV group vs. VPS group (1:1 propensity-matched); within VPS cohort, frequent (≥3 adjustments in first 6 mo) vs. infrequent (\<3) pressure-tuning arms. Participants will * Provide pre-operative clinical data and MRI/CT imaging. * Undergo either VPS or ETV as clinically indicated; 320 VPS recipients receive programmable valves with protocol-driven pressure logs. * Return for standardized neurodevelopmental testing Children's Memory Scale (CMS), Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children(WISC), Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory(PedsQL) and imaging at 6 mo, 1 y and 2 y; valve adjustments tracked electronically.
Age range
17 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Surgical success rate at 6 months post-operation
Timeframe: 6 months