Over the past two decades, interventional neuroradiology (INR) has seen significant advances in terms of safety and radiation protection. However, the management of iodinated contrast media (ICM) administered to the patients remains problematic. There is currently no reference for applying the ALADA (As Low As Diagnostically Acceptable) principle to ICM. In this context, optimising injection parameters seems essential to limit patient risks while maintaining sufficient diagnostic quality. To achieve this, it is necessary to work on a standardised procedure: the most frequently performed being diagnostic cerebral angiography for initial assessment or follow-up of intracranial aneurysms (IA). The aim of this project is to demonstrate that the use of injection protocols with reduced flow rates and volumes would enable non-inferior results compared to the empirical protocol (used in our department) in terms of image quality for the assessment of ICA, while improving examination comfort for patients. A Randomised controlled non-inferiority study involving a four-arm factorial design to evaluate the impact of different ICM injection strategies in diagnostic cerebral angiography. Four groups will be compared: three experimental groups evaluating reductions in injection volumes and/or flow rates, and a control group following the standard protocol currently used in Strasbourg University Hospitals. Each subject will be randomly assigned to a group, and all images will be acquired using the same protocol. By following the standard care pathway and implementing safety procedures to ensure diagnostic quality, patients will not undergo any changes to their usual care and will not run any increased risk of diagnostic error.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Ratio of exploitable 2D and 3D images
Timeframe: 1 day