Mckenzie Versus Maitland Cervical Mobilization Technique in Management of Non-specific Neck Pain. (NCT07290374) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
Mckenzie Versus Maitland Cervical Mobilization Technique in Management of Non-specific Neck Pain.
45 participantsStarted 2025-12-12
Plain-language summary
This study will be conducted to compare between Mckenzie exercises and Maitland cervical mobilization technique in management of non-specific neck pain as regard to neck pain, cervical range of motion, neck function and cervical proprioception.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 29 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria:
* 45 Subjects diagnosed and referred from orthopedist with chronic NSNP.
* All participants will have neck pain with mobility deficit according to ICF classification of neck pain..
* Duration of symptoms is more than 3 months to be chronic.
* Subjects of both genders will be involved in the study.
* Subject are young adult with the age span between 18 \&29 years because this period is characterized by extensive changes, handling choices and opportunities such as moving out from home, choice of education and career, and establishing an adult lifestyle.
* All participants will be selected with body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 24.9kg/cm2 which is considered the normal range of BMI.
Exclusion criteria:
* History of cervical surgery.
* Whiplash injuries.
* Inflammatory arthropathy.
* Myelopathy.
* If neck pain is associated with radiculopathy.
* Vertebrobasilar insufficiency.
* Red flags suggesting of cancer or infection .
* Fracture.
* Diabetic patients.
* Hypertensive patients.
* Obese subjects.
* Vertigo.
* Thoracic outlet syndrome.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.