Mckenzie Versus Maitland Cervical Mobilization Technique in Management of Non-specific Neck Pain. (NCT07290374) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
Mckenzie Versus Maitland Cervical Mobilization Technique in Management of Non-specific Neck Pain.
45 participantsStarted 2025-12-12
Plain-language summary
This study will be conducted to compare between Mckenzie exercises and Maitland cervical mobilization technique in management of non-specific neck pain as regard to neck pain, cervical range of motion, neck function and cervical proprioception.
Who can participate
Age range18 Years – 29 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria:
* 45 Subjects diagnosed and referred from orthopedist with chronic NSNP.
* All participants will have neck pain with mobility deficit according to ICF classification of neck pain..
* Duration of symptoms is more than 3 months to be chronic.
* Subjects of both genders will be involved in the study.
* Subject are young adult with the age span between 18 \&29 years because this period is characterized by extensive changes, handling choices and opportunities such as moving out from home, choice of education and career, and establishing an adult lifestyle.
* All participants will be selected with body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 24.9kg/cm2 which is considered the normal range of BMI.
Exclusion criteria:
* History of cervical surgery.
* Whiplash injuries.
* Inflammatory arthropathy.
* Myelopathy.
* If neck pain is associated with radiculopathy.
* Vertebrobasilar insufficiency.
* Red flags suggesting of cancer or infection .
* Fracture.
* Diabetic patients.
* Hypertensive patients.
* Obese subjects.
* Vertigo.
* Thoracic outlet syndrome.