Clinical Comparison of Cariclast Gel and Rotary Drilling Technique for Caries Removal in 2d Prima… (NCT07270458) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
Clinical Comparison of Cariclast Gel and Rotary Drilling Technique for Caries Removal in 2d Primary Molars
24 participantsStarted 2026-10-01
Plain-language summary
This randomized clinical trial aims to compare two different methods of caries removal in primary molars: the chemomechanical technique using Cariclast gel and the conventional rotary drilling method. The study will evaluate and compare the pain perception, patient acceptance, and operative time associated with both techniques in children aged 5-7years.
Who can participate
Age range4 Years – 7 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
✓. children aged 4-7 years
✓. in good general health, and medically free according to parent history.
✓. Cooperative patients
✓. Children whom their parents will comply with follow-ups.
✓. Children whom their parents who accept to sign informed consent
✓. Broad cavitated occlusal lesion with dentinal involvement
✓. (Black's Class I cavity) and occlusal access.
✓. Radiograph showing dentinal caries up to two-thirds of the dentinal thickness.
Exclusion criteria
✕. Medically or developmentally compromising conditions
✕. Children who will be unable to attend follow-up visits.
✕. Children whom their parents refuse to give written formed consent.
✕. Cases requiring restorative treatment that is not of the Class I variety.
✕. Extensively damaged teeth.
✕. Radiograph showing dentinal caries of more than two thirds of the dentinal thickness.
What they're measuring
1
Pain Perception During Caries Removal
Timeframe: During the caries removal procedure (immediate intraoperative assessment)