Timely detection of fetal brain anomalies is critical for improving prenatal counseling and postnatal neurological outcomes. Ultrasonography is the most commonly used and effective imaging method for evaluating fetal structures; however, diagnostic accuracy can be affected by operator experience, fetal position, and image quality, leading to variability in interpretation. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based image analysis offers a new opportunity to standardize diagnostic assessment and reduce subjectivity in ultrasound interpretation. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical applicability of an AI-assisted model (Alyssia) designed to analyze archived 2D fetal brain ultrasound images. The model will be trained and validated to distinguish between normal and abnormal intracranial findings, focusing particularly on the lateral ventricles and other relevant brain regions. The research employs an observational, retrospective design using anonymized ultrasound data obtained during routine prenatal examinations between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation. Expert clinicians will review and label all eligible images to establish ground truth classifications for model training and validation. A deep learning-based algorithm will be developed to automatically classify these images, and its performance will be evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score metrics. Misclassified cases will be qualitatively analyzed to determine contributing factors such as image quality, anatomical variability, and gestational differences. By comparing AI model outputs with expert-labeled references, the study will assess the model's ability to enhance diagnostic standardization and reduce inter-observer variability. The findings are expected to provide valuable insights into the integration of AI-based decision support systems in prenatal neurosonography. Ultimately, this research aims to support earlier and more reliable detection of fetal brain anomalies, contributing to improved prenatal care and healthier outcomes for mothers and infants.
Age range
18 Years – 45 Years
Sex
FEMALE
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Diagnostic Accuracy of the AI-Assisted Model (Alyssia)
Timeframe: From study start to model validation (approximately 6 weeks).