This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the clinical and radiographic performance of injectable composite versus packable composite in restoring cavitated primary molars in children aged 4 to 8 years. Study Purpose To determine whether injectable composite performs as well as packable composite in Class II restorations in primary molars clinically and radiographically.
Age range
4 Years – 8 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Clinical Assessment of Injectable Composite Versus Packable Composite in The Restoration of Cavitated Primary Molars
Timeframe: Time: T0 = baseline assessment and procedure will be done. T1 =3 months follow up. T2 = 6 months follow up. T3 = One-year follow-up.