This clinical research study is designed to find out which of two different types of bowel preparation works best for people undergoing capsule-based endoscopy procedures. Capsule colonoscopy and pan-intestinal capsule endoscopy ("panendoscopy") are newer, less invasive tests that use a small camera inside a capsule that is swallowed, instead of a traditional colonoscopy that requires a long flexible tube. These tests allow doctors to see the inside of the colon, and in the case of panendoscopy, also the small intestine. They are especially useful when a regular colonoscopy cannot be completed or when doctors need to investigate conditions such as Crohn's disease, anemia, or unexplained bleeding. For these capsule procedures to work well, the bowel needs to be as clean as possible, since the capsule cannot wash or suction away any stool or bubbles. This makes the type of bowel preparation very important, but at present there are no clear recommendations about which preparation to use. Standard preparations often involve large volumes of liquid that patients may find difficult to drink. In recent years, ultra-low-volume preparations (1 liter or less) have been developed to improve patient comfort and make the preparation process easier. In this study, we are comparing two of these ultra-low-volume options: Polyethylene Glycol plus Ascorbic Acid (PEG-Asc), a 1-liter solution and Sodium Picosulfate with Magnesium Citrate (SPMC), a powder mixed with water. We want to see which of these two preparations provides better bowel cleansing for capsule procedures, while also checking which is easier for patients to tolerate. A total of 220 adult patients referred for capsule colonoscopy or panendoscopy were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either PEG-Asc or SPMC. Both groups followed a split-dose schedule, with part of the preparation taken the evening before and part on the morning of the test, along with additional instructions including dietary restrictions, laxative tablets, and clear liquids. The main questions this study is trying to answer are: 1. \- Which preparation results in better cleaning of the bowel, allowing clearer pictures from the capsule? 2. \- Which preparation is easier for patients to tolerate, with fewer side effects such as nausea or vomiting? 3. \- Does the type of preparation affect whether the capsule can complete the examination and reach the end of the colon? By answering these questions, this study hopes to improve the effectiveness and comfort of capsule endoscopy procedures. The results will help doctors decide which bowel preparation to recommend, making these less invasive tests more reliable and accessible for patients in the future.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Adequate bowel cleansing rate assessed by CC-CLEAR scale
Timeframe: Within 24 hours of capsule ingestion